Skip to content

Spouse in Singapore granted minimal spousal maintenance of S$1 per month.

Judge Rejects Woman's Request for $2,500 Monthly Spousal Support, Yet Decreases Ex-Husband's Marital Asset Share by 10% Due to His Repeated Efforts to Sabotage Marriage and Wife's Well-being.

Judge rejects wife's plea for $2,500 monthly spousal support, penalizes ex-husband by trimming his...
Judge rejects wife's plea for $2,500 monthly spousal support, penalizes ex-husband by trimming his share of marital assets by 10% due to repeated actions aimed at damaging their marriage and her well-being.

Modern Court Ruling Upholds Symbolic Spousal Maintenance while Reducing Assets Share

Spouse in Singapore granted minimal spousal maintenance of S$1 per month.

In a recent court case, a High Court judge dismissed a woman's appeal for a monthly spousal maintenance of $2,500, but also reduced her former husband's share of marital assets by 10%. This decision was made in response to the husband's repeated attempts to undermine the marriage and the woman's welfare.

This administrative assistant, who takes home $2,340 a month, will now only receive a nominal maintenance of $1 a month. This symbolic sum is meant to preserve her right to reapply for financial support from her former husband in the future.

The 46-year-old husband, a regular serviceman in the Singapore Armed Forces with a net salary of $5,212 a month, was found guilty of multiple acts against the marital partnership. He denied the wife access to their 12-year-old daughter, breached court orders, petitioned the HDB to acquire the matrimonial flat due to financial difficulties, and even tried to send the wife back to India.

These actions not only resulted in the wife being evicted from the flat by the HDB and police officers but also deprived her of a larger sum than an open market sale of the flat would have yielded.

In his judgment, Justice Choo, the presiding judge, stated that an order for no maintenance is still a "subsisting order for maintenance" under Section 118 of the Women's Charter, meaning the order is still in effect. This means the former husband could potentially be held accountable for further maintenance payments if the wife's financial situation or needs change.

Justice Choo also explained that under Section 113 of the Women's Charter, the court can order a man to pay maintenance to his former wife even after the divorce judgment has been granted.

This case sets a significant precedent in Singaporean law, showing that the court may consider a spouse's conduct when awarding spousal support and dividing marital assets. It also highlights the need for clear communication and mutual respect within a marriage.

Related

  • Kunlavut clinches Singapore Open 2025 title following 2-0 victory
  • Kunlavut Becomes Thailand's First World No.1 in Men's Badminton
  • Thailand's Ratchanok cruises to victory in Singapore Open 2025 first round

Enrichment Data:The Women's Charter in Singapore addresses spousal maintenance through several provisions, particularly focusing on Sections 113 and 118. Here's how it addresses cases where one spouse's conduct undermines the marriage or the welfare of the other spouse:

  • Section 113: This section allows the court to order a spouse to pay maintenance to the other spouse if necessary. The court considers various factors, including the financial needs of each party, their earning capacity, and any disabilities or incapacities. While the Charter does not explicitly mention conduct as a factor for maintenance, courts may consider it indirectly when assessing financial needs and the breakdown of the marriage.
  • Section 118: This section deals with the variation of maintenance orders. If a spouse's conduct has significantly impacted their financial situation or the welfare of the other spouse, they may apply for a variation in the maintenance order.

In summary, while the Women's Charter does not explicitly address spousal misconduct as a direct factor for determining maintenance, the court's discretion allows for consideration of conduct when dividing assets and assessing financial needs. This approach ensures that the welfare of the spouse is protected while also considering broader marital and financial circumstances.

  1. The recent court ruling in Singapore upholds symbolic spousal maintenance, but reduces the assets share, highlighting the court's consideration of a spouse's conduct.
  2. Kunlavut, a prominent figure in sports, recently clinched the Singapore Open 2025 title, showcasing a triumphant victory in the realm of competition.
  3. Amidst general news, the Women's Charter in Singapore provides guidelines for spousal maintenance, including Sections 113 and 118, which indirectly consider a spouse's conduct in marital disputes.
  4. In the world of business, the husband's repeated acts against the marital partnership led to reduced assets share and symbolic maintenance for his former wife.
  5. The decision in the recent court case underscores the need for clear communication and mutual respect within a marriage, emphasizing personal growth and career development.
  6. The finance sector is witnessing the implications of this court ruling, as it sets a significant precedent for marital asset division and spousal support in Singapore.
  7. The European leagues, such as the Premier League, continue to captivate sports enthusiasts worldwide, while policy-and-legislation debates unfold in the backdrop, including changes to spousal maintenance laws.
  8. The husband's attempts to send his wife back to India, breach court orders, and eviction from the matrimonial flat due to financial difficulties illustrate the complexities of crime-and-justice cases intertwined with personal issues.
  9. Skills-training programs are increasingly essential in today's job-search landscape, with various sectors, including sports and education-and-self-development, fostering growth and opportunities for personal and professional advancement.

Read also:

    Latest